<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New beers at Saraveza</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beeraroundtown.com/2009/06/new-beers-at-saraveza/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beeraroundtown.com/2009/06/new-beers-at-saraveza/</link>
	<description>Surviving Portland's overwhelming availability of good beer.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 06:47:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: anónimo</title>
		<link>http://beeraroundtown.com/2009/06/new-beers-at-saraveza/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator>anónimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 23:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beeraroundtown.com/?p=416#comment-487</guid>
		<description>I thought I had a sensitive palette (if not necessarily a discerning one), but how you managed to pull blackberries out of Cascade&#039;s, or &lt;i&gt;anything&lt;/i&gt; out of the John John is beyond me.

I&#039;ve had the Nightfall Blackberry twice, first at Bailey&#039;s the day it went on, and again at Raccoon Lodge on summer solstice (where I wasn&#039;t told what I was given until after I tasted it)… both times I failed to discern any blackberry flavor; in that sense, it&#039;s very similar to last year&#039;s (also couldn&#039;t taste &lt;i&gt;any&lt;/i&gt; blackberry), but in stark contrast with both the Kriek and Apricot (at least last year&#039;s), which are unmistakably such.  Maybe it&#039;s because I&#039;m used to such strong-flavored blackberries in the latter half of August that anything which doesn&#039;t approach that just doesn&#039;t exist to me.

John John I got at at Horse Brass when it was first released (a full imperial pint, no less), and… it was just weak… thinner and less flavorful than a normal Dead Guy (whatever that flavor may be), with a &lt;i&gt;barely&lt;/i&gt;-discernable whiskey-&quot;essence.&quot;  I&#039;m &lt;b&gt;shocked&lt;/b&gt; that this spent 6 months in a barrel… if I hadn&#039;t been told it was barrel-aged, I would&#039;ve never assumed as much.

Ah well… they can&#039;t all be winners.  Now back to Raccoon Lodge for the Summer Solstice IPA (on cask if it&#039;s still available) and the 8 Monks.

-anónimo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I had a sensitive palette (if not necessarily a discerning one), but how you managed to pull blackberries out of Cascade&#8217;s, or <i>anything</i> out of the John John is beyond me.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had the Nightfall Blackberry twice, first at Bailey&#8217;s the day it went on, and again at Raccoon Lodge on summer solstice (where I wasn&#8217;t told what I was given until after I tasted it)… both times I failed to discern any blackberry flavor; in that sense, it&#8217;s very similar to last year&#8217;s (also couldn&#8217;t taste <i>any</i> blackberry), but in stark contrast with both the Kriek and Apricot (at least last year&#8217;s), which are unmistakably such.  Maybe it&#8217;s because I&#8217;m used to such strong-flavored blackberries in the latter half of August that anything which doesn&#8217;t approach that just doesn&#8217;t exist to me.</p>
<p>John John I got at at Horse Brass when it was first released (a full imperial pint, no less), and… it was just weak… thinner and less flavorful than a normal Dead Guy (whatever that flavor may be), with a <i>barely</i>-discernable whiskey-&#8221;essence.&#8221;  I&#8217;m <b>shocked</b> that this spent 6 months in a barrel… if I hadn&#8217;t been told it was barrel-aged, I would&#8217;ve never assumed as much.</p>
<p>Ah well… they can&#8217;t all be winners.  Now back to Raccoon Lodge for the Summer Solstice IPA (on cask if it&#8217;s still available) and the 8 Monks.</p>
<p>-anónimo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://beeraroundtown.com/2009/06/new-beers-at-saraveza/comment-page-1/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beeraroundtown.com/?p=416#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Bo,
Yah, i&#039;m not sure on the % of John John, but I think Josh is probably correct. It did taste a bit boozier then normal, but then again, I&#039;ve had regular Dead Guy taste pretty hot just due to batch variation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bo,<br />
Yah, i&#8217;m not sure on the % of John John, but I think Josh is probably correct. It did taste a bit boozier then normal, but then again, I&#8217;ve had regular Dead Guy taste pretty hot just due to batch variation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://beeraroundtown.com/2009/06/new-beers-at-saraveza/comment-page-1/#comment-470</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:52:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beeraroundtown.com/?p=416#comment-470</guid>
		<description>@ Bo

It can&#039;t be too much more than a normal Dead Guy, which weighs in around 6.5%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Bo</p>
<p>It can&#8217;t be too much more than a normal Dead Guy, which weighs in around 6.5%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
